Not only did the Chancellor of the university write a detailed email to all of the students about Chris Wootton's tragic murder, my mother called me all the way from San Diego saying she heard about it in the news. It was also significantly covered on the internet. Rod, however, was virtually unnoticed except by members of the ethnic communities on campus and in his hometown.
As enraged as I was, I only made a few comments to fellow students in my classes. Adrienne Johnson, however, wrote a piece to the main campus newspaper--The Daily Californian--who heavily covered the Chris Wootton murder in several detailed articles, and who had only given Rod a passing glance.
Adrienne succinctly puts it all into perspective:
Like many students, I was shocked and saddened by Chris Wootton's tragic death.
However, may I comment on the articles devoted solely to Wootton's death? I have counted no fewer than five full-length, prominently placed articles detailing this tragedy. I attended the forum on Sproul Plaza and found myself sandwiched between NBC reporters, TV crews and photographers.
May I also comment on your coverage of another, very tragic death of a graduating senior killed in very similar circumstances-Rodrigo Rodriguez Jr.? This past September, he was killed by a gunman who mistook him for another person. This story received little coverage; there was no community outpouring. I remember only one of very few articles, from Sept. 19, "Student Gunned Down in Hometown." Why, do you suppose, this is? Why would the Daily Cal cover Wootton's death-involved in a fight on frat row -and ignore Rodriguez's tragic victimhood? Could it have something to do with favoring a white frat boy over a child of immigrants? Favoring a science student over an American Studies major?
"Student Gunned Down in Hometown" is an inappropriate, insulting title in comparison with Wootton's article "Community Mourns Shocking Loss of Senior."
It is the Daily Cal's responsibility to inform the community when something of this measure occurs with fairness and equality. Just because Chris may have been more popular should not be reflected in his death's coverage. I feel that this is a grave error on part of the Daily Cal and this letter or a formal apology should be published apologizing to Rodriguez's friends and family.
4 comments:
Hello there! [waves}
Thank you, thank you, AND thank you once again....for this post...we can NOT stand back seething without calling the newspapers and television networks on the carpet for biased, racist coverage. We MUST continue to make the media accountable for its very blatant, insiduous, insulting "oversight" of the missing people of color, and the deaths of people of color.
Thank you for speaking about this issue without apology.
My blog, BLACK WOMEN BLOW THE TRUMPET, is all about accountability - accountability to ourselves, our community, our race - but it is also about holding white America accountable. I encourage black women to blow the trumpet until the sound is heard.
Continue to blow the trumpet!
Lisa
http://blackwomenblowthetrumpet.blogspot.com
Wow, excellent post! Very detailed and well thought out and best of all the article does not accuse the paper of racism or of even selectively choosing what or how they cover, this post actually provides a teaching tool using their own coverage of unintentional racism and bias. My condolences to both families who loss their sons.
Jaycee
I'm glad to hear other people felt the same way I do and even happier to see the Daily Cal fess up to their error by publishing my letter. Rod was overlooked for a bunch of reasons and it is shameful that the Daily Cal went along with it all. Thanks for your support,
Adrienne Johnson
I know the boy,Andrew Thomas Hoeft-Edenfield, that killed Chris Wooten and I have been struggling to write about it ever since it happened.
I was in Oakland when I got the news.
I hate that three am red phone moment of "so and so is dead/injail".
Your blog is dangerous.
Twice in 10 minutes you have been refining post ideas.
Salute.
Post a Comment